Case name: Ratna Alexander Bhambhani Vs. Ruby Complexes Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. Case number: Complaint No. 80 of 2001 Court: Gujarat State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Ahmedabad Bench: N.G. Nandi, J. President Dr. Jatin P. Vaidya, Member Decided on: 18.04.2006 BRIEF FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY: Mrs. Bhambhani is NRI staying in London. She desired to …
Ratna Alexander Bhambhani Vs. Ruby Complexes Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. Read More »
Common Parlance Test must be avoided in the face of requirements of scientific definitions. Case name: M/S. Parle Agro (P) Ltd V/S Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Trivandrum Case number: CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 6468-6469 OF 2017 Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: Hon’ble Justice A.K Sikri Hon’ble Justice Ashok Bhushan Decided on: 09.05.2017 Relevant Act/Sections: Kerala …
M/S. Parle Agro (P) Ltd V/S Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Trivandrum Read More »
“As per the Indian Law and the ethical standards, the Arbitrator could not have appeared at the second stage to defend arbitration award passed by him” Case number/Citation: C.A. No.-000667-000667 / 2012 2020 (6) SCALE 642 Court: Supreme Court of India Decided on: April 04, 2020 Relevant Act/Sections: FOSFA Guidelines …
National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation Of India V. Alimenta S.A Read More »
Provision of Section 95(1) of the old Act is in pari materia with Section 147(1) of the Act, as it stood prior to the amendment in 1994 Case name: National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Ajit Kumar & Ors. Case number: Civil Appeal 6915-6916 Of 2003 (Arising out of SLP© Nos: 18242-18243/2002). Court: Hon’ble Supreme Court …
National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Ajit Kumar & Ors. Read More »
“Human mind is not a tape recorder which records what has been spoken word by word. The witness should be able to say as nearly as possible actual words spoken by the accused” [Case Brief] Shiva Karam Payaswami Tewari V. State Of Maharashtra Case name: Shiva Karam Payaswami Tewari V. State of Maharashtra Case number: …
Shiva Karam Payaswami Tewari V. State Of Maharashtra Read More »
Such unilateral appointment of the Arbitrator by a party when resisted by the other side and as it is contrary to the arbitration clause itself is impermissible. It traduces the arbitration system. Case name: Leslie David Isaac vs Bahadur Bapuji Sanjana Case number: ARBITRATION APPEAL NO. 12 OF 2012 Court: HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY Bench: ANOOP V. MOHTA, J Decided on: 9 …
“There is an exclusive jurisdiction clause vesting such jurisdiction only in the courts at Mumbai” Case name: Emkay Global Financial V/S Gindhar Sondhi Case number: Civil appeal number- 8367 of 2018 Court: The supreme court of india Bench: Justice R.F Nariman Decided on: AUGUST 20, 2018 Relevant Act/Sections: BRIEF FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY: The present …
It is a settled position of jurisprudence that when the law prescribes a procedure to be followed for doing any act or thing then that procedure has to be followed and any violation of such procedure would make the act voidable, if not void. Case name: E.A. Aboobacker & Ors. V/S State Of Kerala & …
E.A. Aboobacker & Ors. V/S State Of Kerala & Ors. Read More »
“If a strong case is made out for impleadment, it is always open for the Courts and Tribunals to order impleadment and to give an opportunity before deciding the main claim.” Case name: Imc Limited vs Board Of Trustees Of Deendayal Case number: SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5694 of 2018 Court: THE SUPREME COURT OF …
The intent of the Code could not have been to give a new lease of life to debts which are already time-barred Case name: Gaurav Hargovindbhai Dave Versus Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Ltd.& Anr. Case number: CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4952 OF 2019 Court: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Bench: ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN J. R. SUBHASH …
Gaurav Hargovindbhai Dave Versus Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Ltd.& Anr. Read More »
