It is only for the petitioner to produce evidence to show that Respondent is liable and have no merits in the case. Case Name: M/S Popular Steel V/S Jahangir Alam and Anr. Case Number: W.P. (C) Nos. 7107, 7108 of 2012 Court: Delhi High Court Bench: Justice Ms. Rekha Pillai Decided on: February 5, 2019 …
Vicarious liability can be attributed only if the requisite statements, which are required to be averred in the complaint petition, are made so as to make the accused/Director therein vicariously liable for the offence committed by the company. Case name: National Small Industries Corp. Ltd V/s. Harmeet Singh Paintal & Anr. Case number: Criminal appeal …
National Small Industries Corp. Ltd V/s. Harmeet Singh Paintal & Anr. Read More »
Transfer not to be registered except on production of instrument of transfer. Case name: Jagatjit Industries Ltd., Galaxy V/s. Mohan Meakin Ltd. Case number: 1994 80 Comp Cas 411 CLB Court: Company Law Board Bench: The Honourable Mrs. Justice S Upasani, The Honourable Mr. Justice Y Rao Decided on: MAY 21, 1991 Relevant Act/Sections: Companies …
Jagatjit Industries Ltd., Galaxy V/s. Mohan Meakin Ltd. Read More »
The relevant factors to be taken into consideration to establish an employer-employee relationship would include, inter alia, Who appoints the workers, who pays the salary/remuneration, who has the authority to dismiss, who can take disciplinary action, whether there is continuity of service, extent of control and supervision, i.e. whether there exists complete control and supervision. …
Balwant Rai Saluja & Anr V/s Air India Limited & Ors. Read More »
The doctrine of “piercing the corporate veil” stands as an exception to the principle that a company is a legal entity separate and distinct from its shareholders with its own legal rights and obligations. Case name: Balwant Rai Saluja & Anr Etc vs Air India Ltd Case number: CIVIL APPEAL Nos.10264-10266 OF 2013 Court: THE …
