Ratna Alexander Bhambhani Vs. Ruby Complexes Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.

Case name: Ratna Alexander Bhambhani Vs. Ruby Complexes Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. Case number: Complaint No. 80 of 2001 Court:  Gujarat State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission  Ahmedabad Bench: N.G. Nandi, J. President Dr. Jatin P. Vaidya, Member Decided on: 18.04.2006 BRIEF FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY: Mrs. Bhambhani is NRI staying in London. She desired to …

Ratna Alexander Bhambhani Vs. Ruby Complexes Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. Read More »

M/S. Parle Agro (P) Ltd V/S Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Trivandrum

Common Parlance Test must be avoided in the face of requirements of scientific definitions. Case name: M/S. Parle Agro (P) Ltd V/S Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Trivandrum Case number: CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 6468-6469 OF 2017 Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: Hon’ble Justice A.K  Sikri Hon’ble Justice Ashok Bhushan Decided on: 09.05.2017 Relevant Act/Sections: Kerala …

M/S. Parle Agro (P) Ltd V/S Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Trivandrum Read More »

Pt. Parmanand Katara Vs Union Of India & Ors.

Human life is more  valuable  and must be preserved  at  all costs  and  that every member of  the  medical profession,  may, every human being, is  under an  obligation to provide such aid to  another as  may be necessary to help him survive  from near-fatal accidents. Case name: Pt. Parmanand Katara Vs. Union of India & Ors. …

Pt. Parmanand Katara Vs Union Of India & Ors. Read More »

Pawan Pratap Singh & Ors. V/s. Reevan Singh & Ors.

Rule 8 of the 1991 Rules, it is plain that 1991 appointees who were selected and appointed in accordance with the service rules cannot be made junior to 1994 appointees even if it is assumed that the selection and appointment of 1994 appointees was for earlier vacancies. Case name: Pawan Pratap Singh & Ors. V/s. …

Pawan Pratap Singh & Ors. V/s. Reevan Singh & Ors. Read More »

Pattu Rajan V/s The State of Tamil Nadu

There must be a chain of evidence proving the circumstances so complete so   as   to   not   leave   any   reasonable   ground   for   a   conclusion   of innocence of the accused Case name: Pattu Rajan V/s The State of Tamil Nadu Case number: Criminal Appeal Nos. 680¬681 Of 2009 Court: In the Supreme Court of India Bench: J. …

Pattu Rajan V/s The State of Tamil Nadu Read More »

Praga Tools Corporation V/s. Shri C. A. Imanual & Ors.

The company being a non-statutory body and one incorporated under the Companies Act, there was neither a statutory nor a public duty imposed on it by a statute in respect of which enforcement could be sought by means of a mandamus, nor was there in its workmen any corresponding legal right for enforcement of any …

Praga Tools Corporation V/s. Shri C. A. Imanual & Ors. Read More »

Proddatur Digi Cable Services V/s Siti Cable Network Limited

The Arbitration Clause empowering the “Company‟ to appoint the Sole Arbitrator in the present case would be vitiated in the light of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Perkins Case name: Proddatur Digi Cable Services V/s Siti Cable Network Limited Case number: O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 109/2019 and I.A. 17896/2019 …

Proddatur Digi Cable Services V/s Siti Cable Network Limited Read More »

Peerless General Finance and Investment Company Ltd. V/s. Commissioner of Income Tax

Income Tax Law – Book keeping entries are not decisive or determinative of the true nature of the entries Case name: Peerless General Finance and Investment Company Ltd. V/s. Commissioner of Income Tax Case number: 2019 (6) SCJ 190, (2019) 416 ITR 1 (SC) Court: Supreme Court Of India Bench: The Hon’ble Justice Mr. R …

Peerless General Finance and Investment Company Ltd. V/s. Commissioner of Income Tax Read More »

M/S Popular Steel V/S Jahangir Alam and Anr.

It is only for the petitioner to produce evidence to show that Respondent is liable and have no merits in the case. Case Name: M/S Popular Steel V/S Jahangir Alam and Anr. Case Number:  W.P. (C) Nos. 7107, 7108 of 2012 Court: Delhi High Court Bench: Justice Ms. Rekha Pillai Decided on: February 5, 2019 …

M/S Popular Steel V/S Jahangir Alam and Anr. Read More »

Perkins Eastman Architects Dpc Vs. Hscc (India) Limited

Unless the appointment of the arbitrator is ex facie valid and such appointment satisfies the Court exercising jurisdiction under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, acceptance of such appointment as a fait accompli to debar the jurisdiction under Section 11(6) cannot be countenanced in law. Case name: Perkins Eastman Architects Dpc Vs. Hscc (India) Limited …

Perkins Eastman Architects Dpc Vs. Hscc (India) Limited Read More »